|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Feb 20, 2006 22:48:32 GMT -5
That's not my point, though that fight was alright as far as lightsaber duels go.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 21, 2006 10:34:36 GMT -5
Indeed. That was a pretty good one.
|
|
Commander Sergi
D.I.H.G Junior Member
Expert At Explosives, Weapons and Rockets!
Posts: 212
|
Post by Commander Sergi on Feb 22, 2006 22:13:17 GMT -5
demohunter, Iam back with fewer spelling errors!
|
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Feb 22, 2006 22:43:55 GMT -5
Heh, we'll see about that, but I was never too big on spelling, as long as I get the gyst of it, I just like to annoy you. By the way, there's supposed to be a space between the "I" and "am". (I don't really care, but hey, it gets you all fired up anyway! Glad you're back, Commander S) Did you vote in poll?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 24, 2006 13:12:04 GMT -5
Sergi did indeed vote in the poll. I can see it.
Heh. Fewer spelling errors. Demohunter.
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 22:26:24 GMT -5
hehe and Vader and Maul are neck and neck wonder who will win...
|
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Feb 24, 2006 23:50:20 GMT -5
Think of it this way, who would win in a duel between them? Maul, of course. Vader was only tough before he got suited up, it took two super-tough trained Jedi to take Maul down. And even then, it was close.
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 23:52:25 GMT -5
well actually he killed Qui-gon and was killed by Obi-one when he was a padawon
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 25, 2006 4:54:18 GMT -5
Yeah, Maul lost to a friggin' Padawan. He killed an old guy in his 50s. Vader on the other hand killed almost all of the Jedi.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Mar 6, 2006 0:02:23 GMT -5
Vader sucks in Battlefront though, slow as crap and has a terrible attack combo.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Mar 6, 2006 13:34:55 GMT -5
How am I supposed to know? I haven't found it yet!
|
|
|
|
Post by Beowulf on Apr 18, 2006 22:32:52 GMT -5
I have a sad tale to tell..... Darth Maul was defeated in Episode one, AS MENTIONED by a padowan. But, I mean it's a movie, the good guys always win...However, the wicked moves he pulls off in SWBF2 are awsome!!! In reality, Obi Wan would ->have<- eaten that lightsaber, and fallen down the bottomless pit, I mean COME ON!!
(Man I hate having to correct myself...At least I do, un like sum peepull hoo cant spel praupper......Sergi)
Obviosly I voted for Darth Maul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Apr 19, 2006 21:30:48 GMT -5
Yes, that's another way of saying it. I would agree to some of that, Maul is so freakin quick, Vader, neat as he is, would have no chance. I mean, Vader was only considered tough because the remaining Jedi (Luke) was also weak. He was the "chosen one", not necessarily the strongest Sith, though he might have been if he didn't have to get the suit. Luke, let's be honest, he sucked. I mean, look at the pace of the battles, the Luke and Vader one had nothing on the Darth Maul fight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mecha on Apr 20, 2006 22:17:09 GMT -5
I tied it again, vader for me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Apr 20, 2006 22:37:37 GMT -5
Any particular reason?
|
|
