|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 21:38:07 GMT -5
I think he just did.....
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 24, 2006 21:44:34 GMT -5
Forgot what now?
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 21:45:48 GMT -5
ugh....(sarcastic voice)the 12 chickens you stuffed down your pants
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 24, 2006 21:49:47 GMT -5
Oh. That's not true, there were only 10 but the did make a habit of laying eggs at the worst time possible.
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 21:51:00 GMT -5
bad image.......BAD IMAGE......
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 24, 2006 21:52:43 GMT -5
Oops, sorry, went too far again.
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 24, 2006 21:54:48 GMT -5
u dont say....
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 25, 2006 5:40:11 GMT -5
Mal, don't do that again! GAH!
|
|
|
Post by hpzr on Feb 25, 2006 15:20:32 GMT -5
I'm not sure if this has already been pointed out, but there's no way I'm reading all the posts, especially when they start losing their grip on the topic. Anyhow, time paradoxes are fun to imagine. Here's an example I frequently use: a guy manages to travel to the past. For some reason, he kills his grandfather, long before his father was even born. If the granddaddy ceased to exist before the birth of the father, then this would mean that the traveler was never born, and thus, never got to kill his grandfather.
WOMG PARADOX.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 25, 2006 16:24:52 GMT -5
Heh, HP funny enough, I couldnt stop thinking about what you said when this topic was made. HPs has a good point.
you go back in time, and kill your granddaddy, he dies, making you never to exist, which means you enver go back in time, so your granddaddy is alive, which means you come alive again, and go back in time and do it again. Its like a loop over and over again. Scary....
|
|
|
Post by hpzr on Feb 26, 2006 8:32:02 GMT -5
Indeed, hehe. Some say that this would disrupt the entire time-space continuum, erasing everything, just like that. POP.
If the traveler killed his grandfather after being born, then the previous sentence wouldn't apply. The future would get altered, but everyone would just get on with their lives.
Of course, there's also the theory that if John went to the past when he was a baby, he would be inserting himself in a universe with an already existant John (the baby). Since all the matter in the Universe never increases or decreases (it just transforms, but it's always the same quantity), this could mean that an additional component (the time-traveling John if he goes to the past) would make the Universe contain more matter than the default quantity, leading to its destruction.
Kids, if someone gives you a lift in the time-space continuum, just say NO! *thumbs up to camera*
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 26, 2006 10:31:01 GMT -5
TO CONFUSING! The first one isn't though!
|
|
|
Post by hpzr on Feb 26, 2006 11:35:14 GMT -5
Give it some thought and you'll know what I mean. I like to think this kind of things once in a while, especially when watching movies related to time-travelling.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 26, 2006 12:26:32 GMT -5
Yeah, thats alot of making sense HP. But yeah, its predicted that one displacement will destroy us all. How do we know, we dont, we just do alot of thinking, and it leads to that conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 26, 2006 21:19:14 GMT -5
For all we know a displacement could leave us off better than we were before. Your theory is similar to mine HP. If you want to see it, it's on the first page and its my biggest post on that page I think.
|
|