|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 10, 2006 21:57:36 GMT -5
true true
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 10, 2006 22:05:05 GMT -5
Lets just say, its incredibly complex, and no one knows if its right, and it hurts the head
|
|
|
Post by Dingodilelover on Feb 10, 2006 22:16:30 GMT -5
Mm, things happen the way they happen, if I had a time machine, does that mean I could go back, stop Eve from eating fruit from the forbidden tree and prevent the fall of man? I see your theory's point, which is rather obvious to even an outside observer without heavy thought, but there's a difference in views here, perhaps the point it all comes down to is what you believe.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 11, 2006 0:11:42 GMT -5
I guess so. Since I dont belive in the bible, since it doesnt make sense, but yeah. Theres also the thing that me and Dantrag thought of where if you travel back in time, you'd kill yourself as well, sicne your de-aging yourself to the point of non exsisting.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 11, 2006 8:05:49 GMT -5
Well, here are 2 theories:
1) If you go back in time and kill your younger self, you die, because you are nonexistant. 2) If you go back in time and stay there, you will go through an infinate state of De Ja Vu.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 11, 2006 12:32:50 GMT -5
The 2nd one makes my head hurt. The first one makes sense.
Oh how about this one:
Say, a ship existed in a type of pocket unaffected by time,,, This ship goes around erasing things from time (not destroying, but erasing) then, the ship erasing a planet, that wsay helped develope the ship itself, Bad move, that ship erased the plaent, so that planet would of never existed, thus the ship would of never been made, and thus the time ship gets erased, and your sent right back to point A, where everything is back to normal, and thier probably starting the making of the ship. They will be trapped in a loop forever.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 11, 2006 12:41:15 GMT -5
That's the same thing as my 2nd theory.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 11, 2006 12:46:08 GMT -5
yeah exactally, well, sorta.
Or how about this one:
I got it from a episode of ST:Voyager. The crew come over a planet, thats destroyed. The weapon used somehow had high time fluxes or soemthing. They get get stuck, and go back in time a bit before it got destroyed. Now they do all they can, to try to stop the destruction of the planet, but at the end of the episdoe, it was actually them that destroyed it in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 11, 2006 13:54:03 GMT -5
Freaky.....
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 12, 2006 14:42:54 GMT -5
Yeah, it was a pretty good episode to. theres lots of Star Trek episodes like that.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 12, 2006 14:49:53 GMT -5
Pretty much the same thing?
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 12, 2006 15:54:32 GMT -5
Not really, they just do alot of neat time theroys and stuff. Like this one time they advaced to a certain speed, which actually accellerated thier evolution, That was a neat episode
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 12, 2006 23:41:15 GMT -5
I personally beleive that time is very, very fragile. All it takes is one displaced grain of sand to changeit. Moving that one grain of sand could very well be our deaths, then again it could be in our favour.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 13, 2006 1:21:52 GMT -5
Well, probably not a grain of sand. common, whats the grain of sand going to do anyways? Think about it. But yeah, time is fragile, but not that fragile
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 13, 2006 12:25:11 GMT -5
Yeah, like a grain of sand is going to hit us on the head and kill us?
|
|