|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 9, 2006 21:11:46 GMT -5
There are so many time travel and time corrution theories out there and the beauty of them is, you can't tell if they are true or not. I have a big one but I have no time to explain it now. Anyone else have one before I explain mine? I expect a few from you Doc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 9, 2006 21:58:38 GMT -5
Yes, theres lots from me. So many. So many. The very basic one I can tell you guys, is that it hurts the brain thinking about this stuff. A good pointer, is that fi you change the timeline, no one will know the difference, and theres a good chance that you in your point of view corrupet the future, but to the rest, its normal. But theres also the fact that maybne when you travel back to the furtre, after altering the past, the timeline ajusts for that event, in which the mere fact of traveling back to the future, will have a effect on you, and you considering the new future normal as well.
In other words, it hurts the head
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 10, 2006 15:30:41 GMT -5
Ugh. Time topics. Ugh. I hate thinking about time. Eventually it makes no sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 10, 2006 15:47:24 GMT -5
Yeah, its really tough to think about. Watching startrek alot gets you thinking about Time travel alot. It hurts the head after awhile
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Feb 10, 2006 16:09:27 GMT -5
Yeah, that's why I have no time theories I'm willing to share, because they make me think. Then, mix alternate dimensions into all that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dingodilelover on Feb 10, 2006 18:02:30 GMT -5
Personally, I think it's impossible to travel in time. At least with that standpoint, I don't have to hurt my brain thinking about it - I have more pressing matters to focus on anyway, especially right now, I'm studying for my Technician ( www.qrz.com/p/testing.pl ). |
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 10, 2006 18:02:32 GMT -5
yeah, its really confusing. Like plenty of star trek epsides say: Dont try to understand time phenomeun, they only lead to more questions
|
|
|
|
Post by Mecha on Feb 10, 2006 19:58:01 GMT -5
MY HEAD, IT HURTS!!!!!
the closest thing to travel o the future is to speed up time and wait
|
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 10, 2006 20:14:09 GMT -5
Accually, Einstien's theories seem to suggest that it is possible DDL.
OK I'll try to tell you my theory. Be warned, it is very hard to explain and you need to beleive or at least know a little bit about fate and destiny:
Suppose you wanted to change the present and you go to the past, then you make that change and go back to the present and everything is exactly the same. Why? you might ask, because in this case history is like a story set in stone, it can't be changed. In the past, history has recorded that someone came from the present to make that change, so history has taken all time changes into account so you can't change it. Understand? If not then I'm not surprised, it took me an hour to explain it to some people. Do you need an example that better illustrates my point?
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 10, 2006 20:16:50 GMT -5
So what your saying is that even if you change something in the past it won't effect the present/future.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 10, 2006 20:25:23 GMT -5
Correct. Do you fully understand my theory?
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 10, 2006 20:28:32 GMT -5
yes so if I were to go to the past and kill say Hitler nothing would change.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Feb 10, 2006 20:29:57 GMT -5
No, because history in the past has already acounted for that change.
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Feb 10, 2006 20:43:13 GMT -5
I know i'm just messing around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Feb 10, 2006 21:42:14 GMT -5
Its tough for Dantrag to explina, but it does make sense. History is always one step ahead in other words.
|
|
