|
Post by Reno on Sept 7, 2006 19:57:31 GMT -5
you mean 30,000....
... Utter Entrance... THE MAN IS BACK!
But yeah, I would live in a desert. I could care less for survival, I would rater die in a desert than a Tundra.
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Sept 7, 2006 22:49:53 GMT -5
if you had a death wish then it would be a better place to die. In the tundra, there might be a small chance of freezing and preserving yourself if you are far enough north/south, but that's not likely to happen.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Sept 8, 2006 7:57:56 GMT -5
...Wow, that was an awkward scentance.
No, I want to die in a dessart so there is no remains what so ever so those looser scientists cant contuct thier worthless "experments"
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Sept 8, 2006 9:53:25 GMT -5
Yes, it was sort of awkward, in a way. . . Back once again, I see. But I mostly agree with your assesment of this topic, I actually said something similar earlier. There's a high chance that you're going to die in either case, and even if you do survive, what would be the point just sitting on a pile of sand/snow? Virtually no hope of rescue, unless you plan on walking several hundred miles.
|
|