|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 1, 2006 15:01:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jun 1, 2006 22:37:33 GMT -5
I would say the same, except that I don't like that game all that much. That is a pretty long wait non the less. I wonder why.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 2, 2006 1:35:17 GMT -5
I don't know. Halo 3 has a really long wait as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jun 2, 2006 22:11:53 GMT -5
You seriously into that game, GS? Quite possibly the dumbest concept of a game in my opinion, minus Kingdom Hearts, of course (Yes, I expect feedback on that one) So you get to pretend to be some half-brained felon. Practically every person I've ever known who has liked that game is some simple-minded moron. (Not necessarily branding you as one, of course)
|
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jun 2, 2006 23:16:21 GMT -5
I would have to agree with Ras on this one. For games like that, I would only like it if there was a point to it, or at least a winding plot, but I have seen one of the grand theft auto games and I am not impressed.
Why would they announce the release of a game when it would take years for it to come out? It has been done before I'm sure but its not the best idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 3, 2006 9:35:29 GMT -5
Well, I'm not THAT into them, they're just fun for when you are bored and all. If I wanted to, I could send a couple hours playing Vice City.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Jun 3, 2006 16:50:50 GMT -5
What are you guys talking about? grand Theft Auto are great games, only the fiends, You get to play in a seneraio of a city gang person, who is given tasks by the mob. Great scenerios. Dont let Dantrag get on your back, he's the harry potter type  I kid. |
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jun 3, 2006 21:45:55 GMT -5
Hardly... Harry Potter was terrible for games! And it didn't take long for me to get board of that book in general! I was merely saying that I prefer games with a point or a good storyline. But I haven't played this game so I don't know. If it has a good point to it then i might have a little more respect for it, but based on the one I saw (probably #1) it was terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 4, 2006 1:44:54 GMT -5
Number 1 sucked. It's nothing compared to Vice City and San Andreas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Jun 4, 2006 10:48:54 GMT -5
Yeah, I hated 1. Terrible, The others were good.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 4, 2006 13:09:02 GMT -5
Yeah, but GTA1, I believe, is the only GTA game that was an airial view. Unless GTA2 was as well. But, no matter, GTA1 sucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jun 5, 2006 22:33:49 GMT -5
Whatever, then. To me, these games represent nearly the pinnacle of pointless gameplay. Simply stupid, not to mention very unrealistic for a game that tries to be realistic, and no, Arthas, Harry Potter and other such childish games do not even enter the equation.
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Jun 6, 2006 20:21:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jun 7, 2006 11:56:18 GMT -5
What did I tell you?
|
|
|
|
Post by evilcrash9 on Jun 7, 2006 19:07:01 GMT -5
The truth I guess  |
|
