|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jan 7, 2007 22:14:25 GMT -5
Although I think some of the new technologies are getting a little out of hand or just plain ridiculous. A camera in a cell phone for example. You are not going to get the best quality picture like that. There is a reason why good quality camera's are being sold.
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jan 7, 2007 22:32:19 GMT -5
". . . The solid unmoving cattle of the majority." This quote comes to mind in such matters. The only reason why technology is constantly becoming smaller, such as cell phone cameras and the like, is because the majority want it. It doesn't even enter the equation that the trends might be idiotic, its just that people can't stand to be independant, the herd of cattle. Irritating. Though I imagine there are some truly innovative technologies out there being made, it is often times difficult to sift through all the useless drivel.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jan 9, 2007 16:27:53 GMT -5
Apple is making the iTV and the Apple Phone. Not to mention that one of the mest things they've made so far is the iHouse (it's like a radio, but instead of putting in a tape or CD, you put your iPod on top and it plays your songlist).
I agree about the comment about the trends only happening because the majority wants them. Just wait until things are too small to see. Heck, by then we're all probably going to have a computer chip implanted in the brain at birth, and be cyborgs.
|
|
|
Post by buttonpresser4815 on Jan 9, 2007 17:08:07 GMT -5
You mean the Ihome? And about the implant at birth, that is supposedly one of the seven signs of the apocalypse. When we depend on technology that much, than we ought to be destroyed
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Jan 9, 2007 17:42:00 GMT -5
All I can say is: "Pathetic" how much they rely on technology and doctors and medicine so much. In the end, you WILL Die! Accept it. I think so many are scared of this, they try to claw on like pathetic roddents to life as long as they can.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jan 9, 2007 18:18:05 GMT -5
You mean the Ihome? And about the implant at birth, that is supposedly one of the seven signs of the apocalypse. When we depend on technology that much, than we ought to be destroyed I never heard that, but I do know that something that has to do with a chip will take place. DDL and I both say after the apocalypse.
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jan 10, 2007 22:45:42 GMT -5
Scenario: A drug is created, the immediate effects of which is to (Somehow, this is hypothetical) extend a person's lifespan by say, 100 years with no concievable negative side-effects. I have a hard time believing that many of you would turn it down.
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jan 10, 2007 23:19:44 GMT -5
It could come in handy, but having eternal life would be terrible. Eventually you would grow tired of the world around you and then you would want to die.
I've just heard about this Iphone today on the news. I can see many people buying into it. (not that I would) They compared it to another similar device, and the Iphone was found to be more of an entertainment system rather than business like its prime competitor. I personally think its a tad on the ridiculous side. Its a phone, music player and it has internet. It has little hope of being a hit right now considering its about $700.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jan 11, 2007 12:31:03 GMT -5
Cisco is sueing Apple for right over the name iPhone.
|
|
|
Post by buttonpresser4815 on Jan 11, 2007 17:10:13 GMT -5
Did any of you hear about the remaining Beatles sueing apple computer company? Well, the nature of the lawsuit is that in the 60s when the Beatles were very popular, they worked under the record company called apple. That company became aware of the developing Apple computer company, and agreed not to interfere as long as they didn't get into music. BUt now, the Ipod is definetely music, so that is why they sued. The Beatles lost, however. It kind of shows how things become obsolete so fast, even one of the greatest bands of all time comes second before the Ipod.
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jan 12, 2007 22:15:07 GMT -5
If you're looking for another example to prove the point that things become obsolete quickly, you need look no further than the computer industry itself. It seems that any given computer becomes obsolete inside of a month. The same applies to Ipods, with some slightly different model coming out one after the other.
|
|
|
Post by Reno on Jan 12, 2007 22:38:04 GMT -5
Yes, I know what you mean. People are just too lazy. They would rather buy a new system, than sped a bit of time doing the upgrades themsevles. Which can add a few years of life yet. Thats what I did. But now even then, I need a new machine. The motherboard is old. Any upgrade isnt regonized anymore. 5 Years I say. Then get a new computer. Dont get a new one every year.
|
|
|
Post by Raistlin Majere on Jan 12, 2007 22:44:19 GMT -5
I find that even replacing it every five years only really applies if you use your computer constantly. As long as it connects to the internet, has decent RAM, adequate video card (For gaming purposes), etc. It should last you for a long, long time.
|
|
|
Post by The Rogue on Jan 12, 2007 23:35:52 GMT -5
Yeah, but that also depends on what kind of computer you get. Dells are good, and Compaqs are alright. Microsoft comes out with a new version of Windows every several years, and if you have a crappy computer, get a new one with every new version of Windows. This computer I'm using I've had for 5-6 years, and it could still very well last me another 3 or 4.
|
|
|
Post by Jarlaxle on Jan 15, 2007 0:29:04 GMT -5
That reminds me of my old OS Old. I have used that thing since 1994 and I still use it at least once a year now. It sill has a purpose, even though I traumatized it a bit.
If all goes well, my current mac should be good for several more years to come. It's reaching its 3rd year already and it shows no signs of degradation.
|
|